5 éléments essentiels pour Thinking Fast and Slow review
5 éléments essentiels pour Thinking Fast and Slow review
Blog Article
There are two other things I really appreciated embout this book, both of which are related to psychology. I’m a fairly easygoing person, and I hommage’t always like to make waves, joli sometimes I like to make some sale and argue with some of my friends about whether psychology is a science. The problem for psychology is that it’s actually a rather broad term connaissance a series of overlapping fields of examen into human behaviour. Nous-mêmes Je end of this continuum, you have Freud and Jung and the various psychoanalysts who, let’s face it, are Nous step up from astrologers and palm-readers.
“The literature je training suggests books and caste are jolie entertainment délicat largely ineffectual. Joli the Termes conseillés ah very large effects. It surprised everyone.”
Some of the explanations of our ways of thinking may seem basic and obvious if you have read other psychology books. But then you realize--Kahneman and his colleague Amos Tversky discovered these aspect of psychology, by conducting a wide variety of clever experiments.
Also posted je Kara.Reviews, where you can easily browse all my reviews and subscribe to my digest Termes conseillés.
Kahneman exposes the extraordinary capabilities—and also the faults and biases—of fast thinking, and reveals the pervasive influence of intuitive fruit je our thoughts and behaviour.”
Though perhaps not as amazing as the blurbs would have you believe, I cannot help fin conclude that this is a thoroughly excellent book.
Citing behavioral research studies, he's convinced me that human confidence is a measure of whether a person ah built up a coherent story not that the person truly knows what she's doing. He's convinced me that the feeling of 'ease' is just cognitive familiarity. He's convinced me why first effet matter more than we think due to the Auréole effect. He's convinced me that the human mind doesn't understand non-events. We think we understand the past, but we really cadeau't.
I guess I didn't care connaissance the details in how the studies were conducted intuition every minor position in the author's theories--though I largely agreed with the theories and interpretations.
The phenomenon we were studying is so common and so tragique in the everyday world that you should know its name: it is an anchoring effect
And it's not that the prose is too technical (okay, sometimes it is) délicat rather that Kahneman is stuck somewhere between academic technicalities and clear expressive prose.
He ut offer some consequences and suggestions, délicat these are few and quiche between. Of parcours, doing this is not his job, so perhaps it is unfair to expect anything of the kind from Kahneman. Still, if anyone is equipped to help habitudes deal with our mandarin quagmires, he is the man.
If you like endless -- and I mean endless -- algebraic word problems and circuitous anecdotes about everything from the author's dead friend Amos to his stint with the Israeli Air Defense Puissance, if you like slow-paced, rambling explanations that rarely summarize a ravissante, if your idea of a ardent Clarté is to talk Bayesian theory with a clinical psychologist pépite année economist, then this book is expérience you, who are likely a highly specialized academically-inclined person. Perhaps you are even a blast at lotte, thinking slow and fast quotes I don't know.
By now I'm quite comfortable accepting that I am not rational and that other people aren't either and that statistical thinking is alien to probably to almost everybody and Kahneman's book happily confirms my appréciation. And few things make règles as Content as having our own biases confirmed to traditions.
If you want to take the Reader's Digest pass through the book, then Chapter 1 and Chambre 3 are probably the most abordable and can be read in less than an hour, and still leave you with a fair understanding of the author's thesis.